Keywords
Epistemology of journalism
Scientific field
Crisis
Tendencies
How to Cite
Abstract
This work presents results of research carried out with a representative sample of scientific articles in journalism indexed in English to identify trajectories in the development of journalism studies over 25 years (1997 to 2021). Three time periods with 5 years each were observed (1997-2001, 2007-2011 and 2017-2021). We sought to verify the emergence and consolidation of research areas at each moment, as well as indications of trends in journalism investigation. The empirical object of the survey was 326 scientific articles and their titles, abstracts and 1,285 keywords, obtained by searching the Google Scholar platform. The analyzes explored three research scenarios and trends: epistemological foundations and questions, broad study perspectives applied to journalism, and specific research models and areas.
References
Bardin, L. (2003). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Para uma sociologia da ciência. Edições 70.
Carlson, M., & Lewis, S. C. (2019). Temporal reflexivity in journalism studies: Making sense of change in a more timely fashion. Journalism, 20(5), 642–650. DOI: 10.1177/146488491876067
Curran, J. (2019). Triple crisis of journalism. Journalism, 20(1), 190–3. DOI: 10.1177/1464884918807034
Deuze, M., & Witschge, T. (2018). Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism. Journalism, 19(2) 165–181. DOI: 10.1177/1464884916688550
Hanitzsch, T. (2019). Journalism studies still needs to fix Western bias. Journalism, 20(1), 214–7. DOI: 10.1177/1464884918807353
Löffelholz, M., & Rothenberger, L. (2011). Continuum Eclético, Disciplina Distinta Ou Subdomínio Dos Estudos De Comunicação? Considerações teóricas e conclusões empíricas a respeito da disciplinaridade, multidisciplinaridade e transdisciplinaridade dos estudos de jornalismo. Brazilian Journalism Research, 7(1), 7-31. DOI: 10.25200/BJR.v7n1.2011.283
Machado, E. (2006). Três pressupostos para que o estudo do jornalismo seja levado a sério (Uma crítica à Taking journalism Seriously, de Barbie Zelizer). Proceedings of the 15° Encontro Anual Da Compós. Associação Nacional dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação.
Mancini, P. (2013). What Scholars Can Learn from the Crisis of Journalism. International Journal of Communication, 7, 127–136. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1967/844
Monje, D., Rivero, E. A., & Zanotti, J. M. (2020). Crisis del periodismo y políticas de retracción de los estados en Argentina, Brasil y Chile. Comunicación y Sociedad, e7622, 1-22. DOI: 10.32870/cys.v2020.7622
Salaverría, R. (2019). Digital journalism: 25 years of research. Review article. El profesional de la información, 28(1), e280101, 1-26. DOI:10.3145/epi.2019.ene.01
Steensen, S., & Westlund, O. (2021). What is digital journalism studies? Routledge.
Traquina, N. (2005). Teorias do jornalismo, porque as notícias são como são. Insular.
Wilkinson, S. (2019). Crisis or transformation? Debates over journalistic work in Canada. Canadian Journal of Communication, 44(3), 373–95. DOI: 10.22230/cjc.2019v44n3a3347
Yamakoshi, S. (2019). “Legitimation crisis” of journalism in Japan. Keio Communication Review, 41, 5-14. Retrieved from http://www.mediacom.keio.ac.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/01-YAMAKOSHI.pdf
Zelizer, B. (2004). Taking journalism seriously. News and academy. Sage.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian journalism research