Literary Journalism as a Discipline: Tom Wolfe and Beyond
PDF (English)
PDF (PT) (Português (Brasil))

Mots-clés

Literary journalism
Academic discipline
Democratization
Political economy
Tom Wolfe

Comment citer

Keeble, R. L. (2018). Literary Journalism as a Discipline: Tom Wolfe and Beyond. Brazilian Journalism Research, 14(3), 862–881. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v14n3.2018.1126

Résumé

The publication of Tom Wolfe’s The New Journalism in 1973 was the seminal moment for the formation of literary journalism as an academic discipline. Wolfe both celebrated the work of more than 20 contemporary journalists whom he dubbed “new journalists” and identified the main elements of their writings. But his concentration on their individual techniques (which has proved so influential in the development of literary journalism in higher education) crucially marginalized consideration of such elements as ideology and political economy, and promoted a problematic form of cultural elitism. In exploring the political economy of literary journalism, this paper will identify similarities between the formation of English as an academic discipline in the UK in the 18th and 19th centuries and the launch of literary journalism in the US in the 1970s and 1980s. And to help literary journalism expand its horizons and draw inspiration from a much wider range of academic disciplines, the paper will argue for its radical democratization.

A publicação do livro de Tom Wolfe The New Journalism, em 1973, foi o momento fundamental para a formação do jornalismo literário como disciplina acadêmica. Wolfe celebrou o trabalho de mais de 20 jornalistas contemporâneos, apelidando-os de “novos jornalistas” e identificando seus principais elementos de escrita. Contudo, sua concentração em técnicas individuais (que se mostrou tão influente no desenvolvimento do jornalismo literário no ensino superior) decisivamente segregou a consideração de elementos como ideologia e economia política, promovendo uma forma problemática de elitismo cultural. Ao explorar a economia política do jornalismo literário, este artigo identifica semelhanças entre a formação do inglês como disciplina acadêmica no Reino Unido nos séculos XVIII e XIX e o lançamento do jornalismo literário nos Estados Unidos nos anos 1970 e 1980. E para ajudar o jornalismo literário a expandir seus horizontes e a inspirar-se em uma gama muito mais ampla de disciplinas acadêmicas, o artigo argumenta a favor de sua democratização radical.

La publicación del libro The New Journalism de Tom Wolfe, en 1973, fue el momento fundamental para la formación del periodismo literario como disciplina académica. Wolfe celebró el trabajo de más de 20 periodistas contemporáneos a los que denominó “nuevos periodistas” e identificó los principales elementos de sus escritos. Pero su concentración en sus técnicas individuales (que ha demostrado ser tan influyente en el desarrollo del periodismo literario en la educación superior) marginó de manera crucial la consideración de elementos como la ideología y la economía política, y promovió una forma problemática de elitismo cultural. Al explorar la economía política del periodismo literario, este trabajo identificará similitudes entre la formación del inglés como disciplina académica en el Reino Unido en los siglos XVIII y XIX y el lanzamiento del periodismo literario en los Estados Unidos en los años setenta y ochenta. Y para ayudar a que el periodismo literario amplíe sus horizontes y se inspire en una gama mucho más amplia de disciplinas académicas, el periódico defenderá su radical democratización.
https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v14n3.2018.1126
PDF (English)
PDF (PT) (Português (Brasil))

Références

Applegate, E. (1996). Literary journalism: A biographical dictionary of writers and editors. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Bacon, A. (1986). English literature becomes a university subject. Victorian Studies 29(4), 591-612.

Berner, R. T. (1998). The literature of journalism: Text and context. New York: Strata.

Campbell, K., ed. (2000). Journalism, literature, modernism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2005). The political field, the social science field and the journalistic field. In R. Benson & E. Neveu (Eds.). Bourdieu and the journalistic field (pp. 29-47). Cambridge: Polity.

Brick, H. (1998). Age of contradiction: American thought and culture in the 1960s. Ithaca: Twayne.

Cottet, H. (2016) American schools of interdisciplinarity: history and literature programs and their early twentieth century traditions. European Journal of American Studies, 11 [online]. DOI: 10.4000/ejas.11407

Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary theory: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Harbers, F., Broek, I. van den, & Broersma, M. J. (2016). Witnessing the sixties: A decade of change in journalism and literature. Leuven: Belgium Peeters Publishers.

Hartsock, J. C. (2000). A history of American literary journalism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Hartsock, J. C. (2016). Literary journalism and the aesthetics of experience. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

History of English as a discipline. Foundation Fundamentals of Literature and Drama. Retrieved from https://resource.acu.edu.au/siryan/Academy/Foundation/English_As_Discipline.htm.

Joseph, S. (2017). Behind the text: Candid conversations with Australian creative nonfiction writers. Melbourne: Hybrid Publishers.

Keeble, R. (2007). Introduction. In R. Keeble & S. Wheeler (Eds.), The journalistic imagination: Literary journalists from Defoe to Capote and Carter (pp. 1-14). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Keeble, R. (2009). Ethics for journalists. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.

Keeble, R. (2010). Peace journalism as political practice: A new, radical look at the theory. In R. L. Keeble, J.

Keeble, R. (2015). Afterword: literary journalism – the personal and the political. Australian Journalism Review, 37(2), 151-55.

Keeble, R. (2018). Putting the politics into investigative journalism. In J. Mair & R. L. Keeble (Eds.), Investigative journalism today: Speaking truth to power (pp. 67-74). London: Bite-Sized Books.

Keeble, R. L. & Swick, D. (2015). Pleasures of the prose: journalism and humour. Bury St. Edmunds: Abramis.

Keeble, R. L. & Tulloch, J. (Eds.) (2012). Global literary journalism: Exploring the journalistic imagination, Vol. 1. New York: Peter Lang.

Keeble, R. L. & Tulloch, J. (Eds.) (2014). Global literary journalism: Exploring the journalistic imagination, Vol. 2. New York: Peter Lang.

Kerrane, K. & Yagoda, B. (Eds.) (1997). The art of fact: A historical anthology of literary journalism. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Kijinski, J. L. (1993). The rise of English studies. English Literature in Transition, 1880-1920 36(3), 339-342.

Lawson, M. (2008). I heard the news today, oh boy. Guardian, 5 April.

Loewenstein, A. (2013). Profits of doom: How vulture capitalism is swallowing the world. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

Matthews, D. (2014). Altogether now: higher education and the cooperative model. Times Higher Education, August 14. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/all-together-now-higher-education-and-the-cooperative-model/2015066.article.

McKay, J. (2011). Reportage in the UK: A hidden genre? In S. Bak & B. Reynolds (Eds.), Literary journalism across the globe: Journalistic traditions and transnational influences (pp. 47-60). Amherst and Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.

Nandorfy, M. (2017). The implications of genre in nonfiction: review of Behind the text by Sue Joseph. Literary Journalism Studies 9(1), 143-51.

Pilger, J. (2004). Tell me no lies: Investigative journalism and its triumphs. London: Jonathan Cape.

Ricketson, M. & Joseph, S. (2015). Literary journalism: looking beyond the Anglo-American tradition. Australian Journalism Review 37(2), 27-31.

Said, E (1993, February 10). Culture and Imperialism. Lecture at York University, Toronto. Retrieved from http://saiayork.org/saia-blog/2014/9/29/edward-saids-lecture-at-york-university.

Said, E. (1994). Culture and imperialism. London: Vintage.

Schulman, B. J. (2001). The seventies: The great shift in American culture, society, and politics. New York: The Free Press.

Sims, N. (Ed.). (1984). The literary journalists. New York: Ballantine Books.

Sims, N. & Kramer, M. (Eds.). (1995). Literary journalism: A new collection of the best American nonfiction. New York: Ballantine.

Sontag, S. (1967). Against interpretation. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.

Swick, D. & Keeble, R. L. (2016). The funniest pages: International perspectives on humor in journalism. New York: Peter Lang.

Talese, G. & Lounsberry, B. (1995). Writing creative nonfiction: The literature of reality. New York: HarperCollins.

Treglown, J. & Bennett, B., eds. (1998). Grub Street and the ivory tower: Literary journalism and literary scholarship from Fielding to the internet. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Viswanathan, G. (1987). The beginnings of English literary study in British India. Oxford Literary Review 9(1 and 2). Retrieved from https://www.uibk.ac.at/anglistik/staff/davis/the-beginning-of-english-literary-study-in-british-india.pdf.

Wolfe, T. & Johnson, E. W. (Eds.). (1973). The new journalism. New York: Harper and Row.

Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.

 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.