O IMPACTO DAS PLATAFORMAS DE MÍDIA SOCIAL NA AUTONOMIA JORNALÍSTICA EM NAÇÕES EM DESENVOLVIMENTO
PDF (English)

Palavras-chave

Autonomia jornalística
Mídia social
Nações em desenvolvimento
Jornalismo

Como Citar

LATUPEIRISSA, J. J. P., & ARDIANSYAH, I. (2026). O IMPACTO DAS PLATAFORMAS DE MÍDIA SOCIAL NA AUTONOMIA JORNALÍSTICA EM NAÇÕES EM DESENVOLVIMENTO: uma revisão sistemática da literatura a partir da base de dados Scopus. Brazilian Journalism Research, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v22n2.2026.1833

Resumo

RESUMO – As redes sociais desafiam profundamente a autonomia jornalística nos países em desenvolvimento, remodelando os papéis tradicionais e levantando dilemas éticos. As plataformas digitais introduzem pressões da comercialização, métricas de audiência e a necessidade de equilibrar o envolvimento com a precisão e credibilidade. Os jornalistas são obrigados a adotar estratégias como a criação de múltiplas identidades digitais e o apoio a meios de comunicação alternativos para manter a integridade. Esta pesquisa, baseada numa revisão sistemática de 22 artigos da base de dados Scopus, foi realizada com foco na interseção entre redes sociais, jornalismo e autonomia de 2015 a 2025. Essas descobertas destacam a necessidade crítica de compreender como essas medidas adaptativas promovem a independência e recomendam mais estudos sobre os impactos éticos de longo prazo, a alfabetização midiática e o papel da mídia alternativa na manutenção da integridade jornalística em meio à influência transformadora das redes sociais nessas regiões.

ABSTRACT – Social media profoundly challenges journalistic autonomy in developing nations, reshaping traditional roles and raising ethical dilemmas. Digital platforms introduce pressures from commercialization, audience metrics, and the need to balance engagement with accuracy and credibility. Journalists are compelled to adopt strategies like creating multiple digital identities and supporting alternative media to maintain integrity. This research, based on a systematic review of 22 articles from the Scopus database, was conducted, focusing on the intersection of social media, journalism, and autonomy from 2015 to 2025. These findings highlight the critical need to understand how these adaptive measures foster independence and recommend further study into long-term ethical impacts, media literacy, and the role of alternative media in sustaining journalistic integrity amidst the transformative influence of social media in these regions.

RESUMEN – Las redes sociales suponen un profundo desafío para la autonomía periodística en los países en desarrollo, ya que están transformando los roles tradicionales y planteando dilemas éticos. Las plataformas digitales introducen presiones derivadas de la comercialización, las métricas de audiencia y la necesidad de equilibrar el compromiso con la precisión y la credibilidad. Los periodistas se ven obligados a adoptar estrategias como la creación de múltiples identidades digitales y elapoyo a medios alternativos para mantener su integridad. Esta investigación, basada en una revisión sistemática de 22 artículos de la base de datos Scopus, se centró en la intersección entre las redes sociales, el periodismo y la autonomía entre 2015 y 2025. Estos hallazgos ponen de relieve la necesidad crítica de comprender cómo estas medidas de adaptación fomentan la independencia y recomiendan seguir estudiando los impactos éticos a largo plazo, la alfabetización mediática y el papel de los medios alternativos en el mantenimiento de la integridad periodística en medio de la influencia transformadora de las redes sociales en estas regiones.

https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v22n2.2026.1833
PDF (English)

Referências

Cañedo, A., Demeter, M., & Goyanes, M. (2024). The Nonpartisan, the Equidistant and the Allied: How Journalists Negotiate Their Digital Selves on Social Media. Journalism, 25(6), 1.365–1.382. DOI: 10.1177/14648849231183246

Cheng, L., & Chew, M. (2024). Functional Interlopers: Lifestyle Journalists’ Discursive Construction of Boundaries Against Digital Lifestyle Influencers. Journalism, 25(2), 372–390. DOI: 10.1177/14648849221143875

Dollah, S. R. B., & Tandoc Jr, E. C. (2022). Triangle of Tension: How Social System, Market Forces & Journalistic Autonomy Influence Web Analytics Use. Journalism Practice, 16(6), 1.209–1.225. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2020.1829984

Essien, E. O. (2025). Climate Change Disinformation on Social Media: A Meta-Synthesis on Epistemic Welfare in the Post-Truth Era. Social Sciences, 14(5), 1–34. DOI: 10.3390/socsci14050304

Ferrucci, P., & Alaimo, K. I. (2020). Escaping the News Desert: Nonprofit News and Open-system Journalism Organizations. Journalism, 21(4), 489–506. DOI: 10.1177/1464884919886437

Koumouris, G., & Blaustein, J. (2022). Reporting ‘African Gangs’: Theorising Journalistic Practice during a Multi-mediated Moral Panic. Crime, Media, Culture, 18(1), 105–125. DOI: 10.1177/1741659021991205

Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Ardyansyah, N. A., Pratiwi, K. A. D., & Nareswari, M. J. R. (2024). Unlocking the Power of Inclusive Communication in Public Relations: A Comprehensive Review of Strategies. Estudos Em Comunicacao, 1(39), 160–182. DOI: 10.25768/1646-4974n39v1a10

Latupeirissa, J. J. P., & Cistadewi, N. M. W. (2025). Social Media Trends and FoMO Among Gen Z: A Systematic Literature Review. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, 19(3), 169–200. DOI: 10.15847/obsOBS19320252631

Mažeikienė, N., Kasperiūnienė, J., & Tandzegolskienė, I. (2021). Framing Nuclearity: Online Media Discourses in Lithuania. Media and Communication, 9(2), 150–161. DOI: 10.17645/mac.v9i2.3818

Mellado, C., & Hermida, A. (2022). A Conceptual Framework for Journalistic Identity on Social Media: How the Personal and Professional Contribute to Power and Profit. Digital Journalism, 10(2), 284–299. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2021.1907203

Molyneux, L., & Nelson, J. L. (2024). “Let’s Not Tank the Reputation of This Organization”. How Newsroom Social Media Policies Exacerbate Journalism’s Labor Crisis. Journalism Studies, 25(9), 931–950. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2023.2263797

Moon, R. (2021). When Journalists See Themselves as Villains: The Power of Negative Discourse. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(3), 790–807. DOI: 10.1177/1077699020985465

Munnik, M. B. (2018). A Field Theory Perspective on Journalist–Source Relations: A Study of ‘New Entrants’ and ‘Authorised Knowers’ among Scottish Muslims. Sociology, 52(6), 1.169–1.184. DOI: 10.1177/0038038517696220

Neff, T., & Pickard, V. (2023). Building Better Local Media Systems: A Comparative Policy Discourse Analysis of Initiatives to Renew Journalism Around the World. Journalism Studies, 24(15), 1.877–1.897. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2023.2253928

Onyenankeya, K., & Salawu, A. (2020). On Bended Knees: Investigative Journalism and Changing Media Culture in Nigeria. Media Watch, 11(1), 97–118. DOI: 10.15655/mw/2020/v11i1/49758

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021a). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, (71), 1–9. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71

Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... McKenzie, J. E. (2021b). PRISMA 2020 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated Guidance and Exemplars for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, (160), 1–36. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n160

Prettel, M. E. G., & Cabrera, J. A. (2017). Professional Autonomy and Security Risks for Journalists in Colombia. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 25(49), 35–53. DOI: 10.18504/pl2549-002-2017

Rito Lima, I., Filipe, V., Marinho, C., Ulisses, A., Chakravorty, A., Hristov, A., Saurabh, N., Zhao, Z., Xin, R., Prodan, R. (2023). ARTICONF Decentralized Social Media Platform for Democratic Crowd Journalism. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13(1), 2–23. DOI: 10.1007/s13278-023-01110-y

Ruffio, C., & Hubé, N. (2022). Digitalization, Standardization, and Diversification: Crime News Under Online‐First Pressure in France and Germany. Media and Communication, 10(3), 78–88. DOI: 10.17645/MAC.V10I3.5439

Ruggiero, C., Serafini, L., & Bomba, M. (2024). The Wall between Journalism and Advertising in times of Platformization of the News. Evidence from the Italian Case. Journalism, 27(3), 659–677. DOI: 10.1177/14648849241308814

Rydenfelt, H., Haapanen, L., Haapoja, J., & Lehtiniemi, T. (2024). Personalisation in Journalism: Ethical Insights and Blindspots in Finnish Legacy Media. Journalism, 25(2), 313–333. DOI: 10.1177/14648849221138424

Salzmann, A., Guribye, F., & Gynnild, A. (2021). Mobile Journalists as Traceable Data Objects: Surveillance Capitalism and Responsible Innovation in Mobile Journalism. Media and Communication, 9(2), 130–139. DOI: 10.17645/mac.v9i2.3804

Scott, A. (2024). Visions of Migration: News Images and the Production of Knowledge on the U.S. Southern Border. Journalism and Communication Monographs, 26(3), 176–247. DOI: 10.1177/15226379241261809

Spyridou, P., Vatikiotis, P., & Maniou, T. A. (2023). Newswork in Crisis: Sourcing Patterns during covid-19 through a ‘Lived Experience’ Perspective. International Communication Gazette, 85(8), 627–645. DOI: 10.1177/26331055231214373

Srikandi, M. B., Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Ramadiansyah, S. A., Dewi, N. L. Y., Pramana, I. B. G. A. Y., & Prayana, I. K. R. (2024). Social Media Politics: Analysis of Political Elite Image Construction in Multiple Country Elections. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(11), 1–11. DOI: 10.31893/multirev.2024278

Stringer, P. (2020). Viral Media: Audience Engagement and Editorial Autonomy at Buzzfeed and Vice. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 15(1), 5–18. DOI: 10.16997/WPCC.324

Tandoc, E. C., & Vos, T. P. (2016). The Journalist is Marketing the News: Social Media in the Gatekeeping Process. Journalism Practice, 10(8), 950–966. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2015.1087811

Tenor, C. (2024). Metrics as the New Normal – Exploring the Evolution of Audience Metrics as a Decision – Making Tool in Swedish Newsrooms 1995-2022. Journalism, 25(5), 1.111–1.129. DOI: 10.1177/14648849231169185

Vis, S., & Picone, I. (2024). “It’s a bit Like Pick and Choose”: How Young Media Users Assign Authority to Cultural Mediators. Journalism, 26(10), 2.166–2.183. DOI: 10.1177/14648849241274461

Wang, J., Zhai, Y., & Shahzad, F. (2025). Mapping the terrain of social media misinformation: A scientometric exploration of global research. Acta Psychologica, 252, 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104691

Yin, Q., Zheng, S., & Fu, Z. (2024). Survival in the Fissure: Strategies of Private News Organizations in the Social Media Era in China. Journalism Studies, 25(9), 970–989. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2023.2274588

Zeveleva, O. (2019). How States Tighten Control: A Field Theory Perspective on Journalism in Contemporary Crimea. British Journal of Sociology, 70(4), 1.225–1.244. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12615

Zeveleva, O. (2020). Self-censorship among Journalists in Tatarstan and in Crimea, a Comparative Analysis: Pierre Bourdieu and New Censorship Theory. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research, 12(3), 150–177. DOI: 10.25285/2078-1938-2020-12-3-150-177

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Brazilian journalism research